Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK

by Kathi
(Garner, NC, USA)

Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK

Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK

Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK
Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK




Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK:- I recently purchased an item described as an ANTIQUE ENGLISH MAJOLICA VASE - POMPEYI DESIGN. I purchased the item aware that it may not be authentic, and I am happy with the piece even if it isn't authentic, but my curiosity has gotten the better of me. The base contains a mark. It is an encircled crown with some kind of flourish at the bottom of the circle and POMPEYI printed at the top. I'm attaching two images, including one of the mark. Can you tell me which manufacturer used this mark?

Thanks.

Kathi

=========================================

Please contribute to this thread by writing in the comments section below – just scroll down...

HOW I MADE MONEY FROM BITS & BOBS OF OLD CHINA

antique china values
.....more


Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK

Hi Kathy

Many thanks for submitting, and hope you are finding the site useful. Now, as I keep saying, I am not an expert, just a worker in the china industry, but I do have a 'nose', and I like to have fun with antiques and collectibles.

Whatsmore, I am learning more everyday because of interesting queries like this one - which very much gets my 'nose' twitching.

Why is my nose twitching?

Well, I feel like there is a big story behind this one. There are certain things about this piece make me want to look closer. If I were to see this at a garage sale or a thrift store (Charity shop if in the UK), I would snap it up in a second with a view to finding out more about it. I would be quite prepared to take it to an expert and be told: "This is nothing, your imagination is running riot".

However, I would buy it and take the chance, as I think the design is very cool and goes along with today's tastes.

So what intrigues me is the fabulous design for a start. I like bejewelled, I like the reticulated trellis work. I like the hand-made, almost naive or folk art look on the item but what seems a very solid looking, well designed, presented and executed manufacturers stamp.

These two things together are incongruous, and get my attention.

The solo crown mark without initials is the worst possible to identify as so many hundreds of makers used a crown. Most better known makers almost always put initials or some other distinguishing mark to further identify their wares.

This mark does not have any words apart from "Pompeyi", which I feel is a reference to the shape or pattern, or range rather than the maker.

I immediately look up the mark, but can find nothing (solo crown - needle in haystack). Frustrating because it is such a solid classic looking UK Staffordshire makers garter mark (like the order of the garter on the Royal emblems).






I look it up online and there isn't much around, but see Worthpoint are selling two matching majolica bottles obviously made by the same company in the same period.

The Worthpoint vendor also doesn't know who this is either - just describing them as "...early English majolica... bottles feature little button-like rosettes on the outside and have a handmade feel. They are signed "Pompeyi" on the base with a crown mark."

The plot thickens, I want to know more, my nose is twitching even more now! Hmmmm... "Early English" is obviously more valuable than "Made last week in Taiwan"

I can find nothing else online.

Then, by some accident, my nose brings me to the subject of Pratt Ware or Prattware - a highly specialized collecting area which I know nothing at all about, but by all accounts is quite sought after.

I wanted an easy quick definition of what Prattware was and who Mr Pratt was. The best I found is quoted below but the full article can be read here:- Old & Sold Article on Pratt Ware
    "Pratt Ware and Pot Lids

    ONE OF THE oldest Staffordshire pottery works was that of Felix Pratt at Fenton, which was in operation continuously from 1775 to 1885...

    Of the many different kinds of pottery made by Pratt and his successors {..namely F & R Pratt & Co Ltd of Fenton, Staffordshire...} two types are especially popular with present-day collectors...

    The attractive and colorful cream-tinted earthenware jugs and mugs with relief decoration have long been known as Pratt ware, although they were also made elsewhere in Staffordshire, as well as at Leeds, Castleford, and several other potteries. It looks like the finest old Italian majolica apparently.

    I then looked at the marks of F & R Pratt as many of the original Felix Pratt wares are unmarked. I did not find your mark, but I found a mark showing a similar crown to the one shown above, but without the knotted belt circle device around it and with the words "F & R Pratt & Co Ltd Fenton Manufacturer to HRH Prince Albert". This mark dated from 1847 - 1860.

    So is your item paying homage to a mix of old references?

    The answer to the above questions are, I simply don't know, but would love to find out.

    Any knowledgeable contributors who feel thay may be able to help with this one please post in the comments section below.

    Kathi, many thanks for taking the trouble to upload such an interesting submission and nice photos, and I hope we can get this resolved soonest.

    Best regards

    Peter (admin)

    p.s. The following page is a 'must see' if you are researching fine china - for value and identification:-

    Researching the identity and value of antique and vintage fine china.

Comments for Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK

Click here to add your own comments

Antiques & Fine China Collectibles Query - CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK
by: Kevin O'B

I too have a piece of this type of pottery. I was cleaning my dresser and on a whim I examined a vase that I had inherited a few years ago. It sat in my parents home for 50 years. Mine is a tall vase 11 inches tall, more rounded at the base with handles on the side. Rosettes all around, identical to the original picture. I was told it was my great-great grandmothers. she would have been born about 1835. Mine is a very different shape but it sounds like an idential mark. SO the theory that is a body style mark probably won't hold water. I have pics I would like to up load but not sure how. Ain't the internet great When I did a search on Pompeyi, your site was what came up. Thanks in advance, Kevin

Thank you
by: Anonymous

Hi Kevin,
Thank you very much for your input. I would love to see a picture of your pot if you figure out how to upload it.
-Kathi

Antiques & Fine China Crowned Pompeyi
by: Peter (admin)

Hi Guys

Yes please Kevin, send the photos to me here and I will add them manually to your comment:-

peteradmin@theclayartist.com

Just at the moment only the original submitter can upload pics.

Be sure to cross reference the pics for me so I know where they are for - quote the page:-

http://www.figurines-sculpture.com/antiques-fine-china-collectibles-query-crown-mark-and-pompeyi-mark.html

Regards

Peter

p.s. the Pompeyi might mean the 'pattern' - i.e. the bejewelled majolica collection of that particular manufacturer.

Garter & Crown Mark on old looking majolica wares
by: Peter (admin)

We got some interesting news to report on this issue of the Garter & Crown mark on old looking majolica wares.

There is a school of thought that these items are from modern (21st century) Chinese production - similar to the intricate and deliberately aged wares of the 'Wong Lee' factory.

Here are some photos from Arline who kindly did some research on our behalf on this subject. See how the base has been deliberately aged to look like Victorian majolica. No wonder my nose was twitching!

crown & garter pottery mark

Crown Mark
by: Anonymous

Much too good for Wong Lee or similar. This is probably a Minton mark mid to late 19thC.Read about this type of ware in the "Minton Bible" by Atterbury - "Pompey ware". Pompeiian ware have this embossed surface - just for inf.

Pompeyi
by: Serina Leeanne

Hello i would like to add my knowledge of Pompeyi.
I purchased 2 rather large identical Pompeyi vases several years ago.

I had them valued by Christies auction house, as when i emailed the photo's of them, they too initially thought they were English majolica, and were obviously keen to see them as they would have worth a bomb.

However upon Christies seeing them they advised me that they were not infact English but Hungarian Pecs 1890's, and worth around £300 - £400.

Not sure if this is true, but If you look up Zsolonay some of the works are very similar in style, and still quite valuable.

Hope this is useful

CROWN MARK AND POMPEYI MARK cont/...
by: Peter (admin)

Serina, thanks for your remarks, this adds to the knowledge base here on the site. Who is to argue with Christies? But I somehow don't think the mark looks to be Hungarian in style somehow.

I looked up Pecs Zsolnay ware and there wasn't a great deal of images online. What I saw was very high ceramic art, but none of it looked exactly like this Pompeyi ware and was clearly marked with the 5 tower pottery mark of Zsolnay Pecs.

Pecs Zsolnay 5 chimney tower factory pottery mark

Above:- The Pecs Zsolnay 5 chimney tower factory pottery mark

Pecs Zsolnay vase

Above Reticulated Vase Made in Hungary 1880-90 with the standard Zsolnay Pecs 5 chimney tower (stamped in blue).

The above vase photo is shown courtesy of http://www.magyarkeramia.hu, who also have a very good history of the Zsolnay Pecs company along with many great photos of their wares.

So we have one person saying 'English Minton', another saying, with some authority, 'modern fake', and Serina saying Zsolnay Pecs late 19thC - on the authority of Christies, no less.

Don't forget the evidence of the first contributor, Kevin who assured us the same items had been "in my parents home for 50 years.... all around, identical to the original picture. I was told it was my great-great grandmothers. She would have been born about 1835". 50 years is the 1960's. Not proving 19th century at all.

Despite Christies apparently saying otherwise, I don't think this Pompeyi majolica ware has anything to do with Zsolnay Pecs. Zsolnay were a multi award winning ceramicists of the highest order (look at the sophistication of the glaze above). Nice as the Pomeyi majolica is, it is far less sophisticated a product.

I have trawled through my Goddens encyclopaedia of marks for Minton and they are showing an almost identically designed mark for the year c. 1851 (much earlier) than Pecs.

The only difference between the standard Minton mark shown in Goddens and the Pompey or Pompeyi mark above is that "Minton & co" is written above the crown, replacing the word Pompeyi. I don't know the colour or size of this marking as the reference an illustration in black and white. Somehow a large red Minton mark seems unlikely.

Incidentally, some sources say that the word "majolica" was first coined in 1851 by Minton. Interesting!

ref:- My vintage and antique china values page

Peter (admin)

More Pompeyi here in NZ
by: Benita

I was a collector of this stuff for many years and searched the world for it. I have 9 peices. Ive never been able to find out anything about them.
Its delicious stuff and attracts many comments.
I gave up buying in the end because I couldnt find any info and now they sit collecting dust in the back shed. *Hangs head in shame*
If anyone wants to make me an offer on it Id be happy to consider it. benitam@xtra.co.nz

Pompeyi vase on ebay
by: Mary

I see there is one seemingly identical to yours on ebay right now. The seller is calling it "English".

MY POMPEYI MARK
by: Serina Leeanne

Hello Guys, just to give an update on your comments to my info, i am totally in agreement that Pompeyi are not Hungarian Pecs as i was originally told by Christies (see Peter's discussion above).

I had taken my vases to my local Christies auction house - my vases do not have the red crown circle backstamp shown on the original photo above. One vase has a sword and a number 5 and some other letter/number? painted on it, and the other vase has a letter and number painted on it.

It was only til i googled the style that i found other items stamped Pompeyi, and was also led to your site, where i shared what i had been told.

Note that my vases should have the open work around the top, but this has been crudely cut off both before i bought them.

I have sent photos to Peter who will hopefully upload them for your information, which may hopefully solve the mystery??.

Serina


Red Circle Crown Mark which looks like an old Minton mark continued.....
by: Peter (admin)

========================

Photos added by Peter (admin) see below

Thanks for sending these in Serina.

Modern fakes or old Minton majolica?.... that is the question!

From looking at these items - without the old Minton style mark, I can't think why Minton would not have marked their wares with the appropriate mark for the range and the period. It seems to me they were always very fastidious about the way they marked their wares.

Why would they not mark their wares - they were a large and prestigious fine china firm on a par with Wedgwood, Worcester, Derby, Coalport, Doulton etc?

However, Serina's marks do not look too much like what a modern Chinese firm would put on their wares if they were trying to fool us into thinking they were old. Seems to me they would be much more likely to put on the Minton style red circle and crown mark.

Serina's marks seem so subtle they look to be genuine painters marks to me, rather than faker's marks?

....And why would anyone chop off the top reticulated fretwork? Complete madness! A lot of work to butcher a piece of ceramic - for what reason?

However, this strange phenomenon might well suggest these vases have been around longer than a modern fake. Why would someone obtain these vases in modern times and then think it was a good idea to get technical with their buzz-saw?

I don't think anyone nowadays would want to do such a thing - I can't think of any good reason to do this in today's world unless you are either mad, or have no sense, or no life.

However, a person from a different era might have thought very differently to us (in a way it is impossible to fathom for us). They may have thought it a grand plan to customise an old majolica vase - taking great pains to cut off it's upper section in a crude manner.

Perhaps they stood back, looked at their work (with their head to one side) and said "Ahh, now THAT'S better!"

The mystery deepens.....

I am sure, in the end, Serina's photos will help us solve this one, but in the meantime, I am perhaps even more confused than I was before.

Can anyone recognise the marks on Serina's vases?

vases with knobbles on

Jewel Embossed Majolica Ware without the Minton Crown and With Painters Type Marks
by: Serina

Hi Peter

thankyou for adding my update and photo's. What a mystery this porcelain is !!

Just to update you i believe someone probably dropped one of the vases years ago and damaged the fretwork beyond repair, so cut it off both vases, as i suppose years ago restoration would not have been very much heard of.

Also i just found this interesting item of pottery, not the same style as our discussion on ebay which has a blue POMPEYI stamp in a garter but without the crown ??

Here is the link below

http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-POMPEYI-VASE-4-TALL-UNIQUE-STAMPED-MAKER-/190669590962

Hope the info is useful.

I have emailed a few museums too so if i get an answer i will forward it onto you.

Regards

Serina

===================================

Reply by Peter (admin)

Thanks Serina. Let's see what the museum expert's say.

The hand-made looking pink pouch thing on ebay looks far to home made to be anything Minton, but, you know, some very strange things were made in the name of art majolica in the early days - but not as far as I can see by Minton.

The seller, interestingly says "SIGNS OF AGE AS SHOWN IN PHOTOS---Maybe some of the gold trim around the flowers is fading."

Modern Chinese makers do the distressed look very well.

I searched and found another of these item on ebay which had two rather deliberate looking chips and ageing on it.

I notice a lot more of this stuff has appeared on the market since we uploaded the first post (do a Google image search and see - there was virtually nothing when I did this a while back).

Maybe this is some big con, and maybe some conners have been posting here (owned by great-great-Grandma born in 1835? Kevin.... really, swear on your great-great-Grandma's grave).

I just looked over 1400 auction sales of Minton Majolica over the past few years and there is nothing shown that remotely fits the bill to have the design and production values similar to this bejewelled majolica ware we area showing on this page.

Minton majolica is without exception more 'sophisticated' than these items in terms of design and production. This majolica look very crude in comparison to Minton's.

I don't think any genuine older firm would have played around with marks the way this range is playing around with it's markings.

It's almost like some modern faker is saying "let's put the Pompeyi stamp on this run".... or "OK, lets put some painters type marks on this one".... "now we'll put the pompeyi mark, but not have the crown on this time".

My nose is still twitching.

Be interested to hear what the museums say.

Regards

Peter (admin)



First answer by Museum to Pompeyi ware
by: Serina

Hi Guys

The first reply said: "the style is more associated with Hungarian potters such as Fischer of Budapest who were making wares influenced by Turkish pottery in the late 19th century. As such I am afraid they are of quite modest value at auction, maybe somewhere in the £100-200. region".

Serina

============================================

Reply by Peter (admin)

Hi Serina

Most grateful for you sharing this.

I looked at Fischer ware from Hungary (see photos below). It may be modest in price, but it is very nice - actually too nice to be the maker of the mystery jewelled ware we showing above.

Again, like Minton and Zsolnay Pecs, Fischer is much more finessed than our mystery ware.

Similarly, Fischer tends to be very well marked (see below), so I can't see why they would make inferior wares, then mark them in a weird manner as to impersonate an old Staffordshire mark. This does not make sense on any level (unless it happened in more recent times under the communist production - when nothing in terms of business practice seemed to make sense).

Below is a selection of the Fischer ware which is close top the Pompeyi ware shown above, only much better made.

FIGURINES SCULPTURE

FIGURINES SCULPTURE


Our Pompeyi ware, is definitely influenced by the lovely wares of Fishcer of Budapest, but if made by them (which I am not convinced about), is a more modern version of their 19th century Turkish ranging.

I am really coming round to the fact this is modern rip-off ware. Just look at the difference in quality between genuine Fischer and the Pompeyi ware.

Serina, thanks for sharing this knowledge and getting this thread moving in the right direction.

Peter (admin)

Example of real Fischer
by: Serina

Hi Guys

I just found this reference for a lovely Fischer teapot (see photos below).

Serina

=====================================

Reply by Peter (admin)

Thanks Serina....

This is clearly a real 19th century example (very nice, very finessed, properly marked, not saying "Pompeyi"):-

FIGURINES SCULPTURE


I don't know who made the more modern ones with the weird backstamps, but they are not as well made as these originals.

Peter (admin)

Apprentice works perhaps?
by: Anonymous

Could Pompeyi ware being be what the apprentices of Fischer were making as they were learning. It seems a bit far fetched with the ornate back stamp. What do others think?

I have pictures but.....
by: Benita

I dont know how to upload them to admin. Help please. Pics are of several Pompeyi peices and the stamps

upload to admin
by: Serina

Hello Benita

would be nice to see your pompeyi items and marks.
Send photo's to peteradmin@theclayartist.com and he will upload them for you.
regards

to annonymous
by: Serina

I think the theory two above could well be a good line of inquiry. It makes sense as the similarities in colour and style are strong !!

Enlgish Minton Majolica? Hungarian Fischer? Modern Rip-offs?
by: Peter (admin)

Many thanks to Benita Martin for sending in photos of her fine collection and adding greatly to this discussion thread.

pompeyi ceramics

pompeyi ceramics

pompeyi ceramics

pompeyi ceramics

My Thoughts on the Pompeyi Marked Collection
by: Peter (admin)

Red Pompeyi backtamp Jewelled ware.

Is this English Majolica by Minton?

Is this Hungarian ware by Fischer?

Is this modern reproduction?

There is something about this naive styling which appeals to the modern eye.

I think although it has an old looking backstamp and the styling looks like 19th century Fischer, this is modern, not 19th century and below I will say why.

Remember, I am not an expert, just a professional modeller and a collector of information.

I was searching around (again) for this Pompeyi ware online and a seller on Worthpoint (seemingly unaware of its similarity to Fischer of Budapest's 19th Century Turkish influences wares) was absolutely adamant that this ware with the Pompeyi backstamp was 19th century English majolica - influenced by the excavations at Pompeii.

This seller sounded very confident and certain (perhaps too confident) but did not show any citations or produce any evidence of this supposed classification...

The ware itself looks indeed like it could be crude old Staffordshire's attempts at majolica which comes out as 'folk art' - a bit like the Staffordshire flat-back figurines.

Minton's majolica though was just too well made to be so 'naive' - they just couldn't help themselves. Any Victorian production manager producing wares as primitively finished as the Pompeyi ware shown above would have thrown himself off the Ironbridge in shame.

I looked though 1400 listings of Minton majolica over the past few years sold at auction and none of it looked like this. 19th century Minton was simply better made and higher quality.

Minton didn't make this style of wares but, it seems, Fischer of Budapest Hungary did. However, Fischer's 19th century examples (as can be seen above) are, again, much better quality than our examples - as can be seen from the photos above.

Remember, production values then were a lot different to what they are now - the standards were higher.

So we have crudely finished Hungarian style wares with an English Staffordshire style marking?.....

What are we to make of this?

I don't think this is Far East modern rip off because the scribbled factory markings seem to be decidedly European. This would, perhaps, be a bridge too far in terms of deception by the Far East makers (although knowing how sophisticated Wong Lee are at making old European looking stuff, it could be a double bluff).

It could be a modern range made in Europe and deliberately potted to look old and distressed. I think this is being done in Europe as well as China, but I don't have any threads on this site which highlight this yet (unlike Wong Lee rip-offs).

Peter (admin)

Pompeyi-Alhambrian English connection
by: Anonymous

Looks like this Pompeyi mark was used by the Alhambrian Majolica pottery that was located in Staffordshire England.

I realized Pompeyi was Spanish for Pompeii, which led me to Alhambrian, which used a Moorish style frequently. The garter mark is the same for both, so it appears this was our mystery maker!

Karen in TX
Internet Sleuth

Is ALHAMBRIAN MAJOLICA (England) a made up modern fake name?
by: Peter (admin)

Hi Sleuth

I don't know why my hackles are rising, but the more I see of this attractive (to the modern eye) naive majolica with the old looking Staffordshire style markings (whether Pompeyi or ALHAMBRIAN), together with the slightly over-distressed finishing etc, the more I am of the opinion it's just modern production from clever people sourcing from China (people akin to fake specialists Wong Lee - who could be known respectfully as very tasteful reproduction specialists had they not put the spurious date of 1865 on their wares - together with a very English looking backstamp).

Look on ebay, you will see a lot of this Alhambrian and or Pompeyi stuff around now - trying to sell for $70 - $100 USD (good profit on Far East stuff).

Look on Staffordshire authority sites like potteries.org, you won't find any mention of this ALHAMBRIAN MAJOLICA (England) factory at all, look in Godden's encyclopaedia (the veritable bible of English pottery marks) and you won't find this so-called firm either.

Are we trying to suggest this was a known factory which has just been overlooked by the greatest authorities on planet earth? Hmmm... possible but unlikely.

If so please give details and citations.

If so, how come so much of this stuff has so mysteriously started to appear on eBay and other online selling sites lately?

A couple of years ago when this thread was new, I could find almost nothing of this stuff online. Gradually, more and more of this ware has been conjured up from somewhere. Obviously, there was a lot of long lost jewelled majolica in peoples' attics:?

Until such time as we get evidence to the contrary I, for one, am presuming this stuff is modern fakery/reproduction - so BUYER BEWARE!!!

We had another thread very similar to this one where the source of the fake old mark was in fact a modern (and very nice) Italian based website wholesaling beautiful reproductions (these people clearly designed the wares and old the looking stamp to go with it, and got it made out in the Far East where prices are much cheaper and quality is reasonable).

There is nothing wrong with this in my book unless the wares then begins to be passed off by third parties (either through ignorance or deceit) as antique, rather than modern.

BTW, sleuth, Pompeya is the Spanish for Pompeii, not Pompeyi. So you did totally amazing sleuthing to get that connection!

The only non-selling reference to these wares online (apart from this site) is one paying membership marks site (that shall be nameless) which lists "ALHAMBRIAN MAJOLICA (England) - ca 1880s - 1910", but I think it may be possible they have been fooled into making this listing. I would write to them to ask, but I have found them quite difficult to work with in the past. I may be wrong, of course, but the lack of reference both on and off-line is very telling.

A very interesting thread, thanks to all. Keep it going.

Peter (admin)


original inquiry
by: Kathi

Hi Peter, I made the original inquiry a couple of years ago and have found it fascinating to follow this discussion. I have to agree that the pottery appears to be strongly influenced by 19th century Fischer; however, I think you are probably correct in saying that it is a modern rip-off. I love my little piece, but I didn't pay much for it.

Pompeyi Pottery Mark - Another version
by: Steven Grim


pompeyi-pottery-mark



I have a piece of this ware and here is my mark and the piece is yellowish cream color with the same decorations as everyone else and it look like the lace top was remove from mine as well.

Steven

ENGLISH ROMANO MAJOLLICA ???
by: Serina Leeanne

Hi Guys,

Just picked up this lovely little vase with a serpentine handle and the same POMPEYI embossed style and YES garter backstamp. Although it is mainly blue and not in cream and has heads and crosses on the embossing not flowers.
When i googled majolica Romano a lot of similar pieces in style and pot came up.


romano-pompeyi



Could this be the answer?

Serina

===================================

Reply by Peter (admin)

Hi Serina

Thanks for the photos and adding greatly to this debate. I guess you mean the vase with the handle and the spout (otherwise known as pitcher or jug)?

I am not sure what you mean by "is this the answer?". One of the listings stated the blue pompeyi style pot was made "by Romano Czechoslavakia". Note the misspelling of Czechoslovakia. No such company as far as I know. If you know different, please post. The word Romano seems more likely the colorway (blue).

You must be using a different style of Google-Fu to me because when I did some searches, I definitely did not find very much at all similar to these pompeyi pots listed under "majolica Romano". Respect to your search expertise, please share this art with us so we too can find muchos majoloca romanos.

The fact remains, the maker of these items seems terribly coy about coming straight out and admitting who they are - which is the usual state of affairs for Chinese and Japanese pottery and porcelain, but more unusual for European companies, unless they have something to hide (see above my photos of the very straightforward markings of Fischer of Budapest - who have nothing at all to hide).

It seems convenient that the names of these pots keeps evolving. What is the first thing a potential buyer on eBay does? They look up the name. They find this page and realise the pot they like might not be as old a majolica item as they first thought. So the maker changes the name on the next batch for exports, so as to become invisible online once again. Now that's definitely Google-Fu!

So while all these similar mystery items shown on this page are not exactly fakes, they may well be being tricksy and coy about who made them and where they actually originate from, because, frankly, there's a market on aBay for attractive pottery and porcelain that unsuspecting people might believe to be old English majolica or Fischer faience, or old Staffordshire, or Minton majolica.

Peter admin

CONCLUSION:- THESE ARE NOT ANTIQUE MAJOLICA (from England or Europe). THEY ARE MODERN, MADE TO LOOK OLD
by: Erskin Walters

I saw this discussion, then, as chance would have it, I stumbled across a listing of the lighter color of these products (as seen above) with YET ANOTHER type of marking. It was a blue slash line with dots or smaller dashes either side - not the pompeyi, nor the old garter mark, nor the Romano brand - just a mysterious blue slash with two smaller slashes.


blue-line-with-dots-either-side-majolica-mark



What next?

As this website catches up with the scam and exposes the fake mark, they invent a new one, so the sellers can carry on the deception of this being 'old Majolica'. This jar was selling for nearly $40 - a good profit on something which would cost around $1 to make in a sweat shop.

If this were an antique majolica mark, they would certainly not keep changing their minds about the marking, and they would not be suddenly flooding the market with (as Peter rightly says) a new generation of marks with each container load shipped over.

To conclude - BUYER BEWARE!

Many thanks to Peter for allowing us to discuss this issue. I know Peter is being more polite and less direct than me about it, but these are my strong personal views.

Erskin W.


An additional 'Romano' pottery mark
by: Mike Gibb

Hello there,i found my way to your fascinating discussion forum when searching for information on a 'Antique nautilus vase Staffordshire Romano'.
This was how it was presented on ebay on 27 Jan 2014. If you do a search you should still get original ad. Anyway, i had spotted this intriguing little vase and thought to myself i have got a few days to look into the mark. I have several of the more popular books including Godden's 'Bible'.
Lots of similar garter type Staffordshire marks, but no 'Romano'.
Google searches proved fruitless, then i found my way to your site, which i have bookmarked by the way, and as i read my way through the threads
i thought i must be on to something here, because even the 'experts' are stumped.
Then as i got towards the end of the Pompeyi chat
and on to Benita Martin's images of her vase with the exact same markings, although decorated in a different style, it slowly dawned on me i was looking at a very clever fake.
So i decided, because i enjoyed reading all of the detective work involved in reaching the final conclusion, i must have my own little example.

Not fake
by: Benita

Sorry but I cant accept that these are fake at all. At least not a modern fake. They are quite obviously very old and from the late 1800s or early 1900s at earliest. One of the pieces I have was my nanas. She tells me that it was in the family home when she was a girl and was told it was old then. Apparently it was always crazed and it hasn't changed any in her life time. She was born in 1915 and only recently died.
She seemed to think that they were Czechoslovakian or Hungarian. Her family travelled a lot.
So.... Until someone comes along with more knowledge I think the case is still open.

I inherited a Pompeyi vase from my Dad
by: Virginia

My father was born in Yorkshire in 1914 and inherited it from his Grandmother. I also have his Grandmother's old oak Stationery Box and Staffordshire Spill Vase. These were the only things he inherited from her. It makes me sad that people are deciding these are fakes. They are so cool and they are really antiques.


I'd be happy to submit pics of mine
by: Virginia

just let me know how to do that.

boot sale find NEW
by: Anonymous

i brought one of these today, backmark pompeyi over crown.This is not modern! this came from a 90yrs old womens house the handle had been off and put back on, i can see the old brown glue. no chance this is modern.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Antique China and Fine China Collectibles.





Search This Site
e.g. for your mystery pottery marks:

antique roadshow valuations

Want to know the
value of your stuff?




how to earn money from your art & craft

The artists, sculptor's and crafter's guide to success



is she real